HOUSES
- Rex Ellis
- Sep 20, 2024
- 3 min read
The big preoccupation at the moment with Government (and people who haven’t got
them) is “houses”.
Despite the government's prediction there’s no way they will reach their target and
even if they did there will still be a massive shortfall. Because Australian’s (some of
them!) are getting lazier and not prepared to work hard anymore, we have to keep
immigration high to fill essential jobs, but where are they going to live?
The powers that be seem to think that everyone needs one of those cream brick jobs
with a grey roof, lined up shoulder to shoulder with a token back yard, that cost
around $500,000 each. They continue to ignore “hempcrete” which I never get sick
of writing about. The amazing material that is fire and waterproof, relatively cheap,
and “actually breathes” – eliminating the need for heating and cooling. The only
people to miss out there would be the air conditioning / heating businesses, but I
reckon they would still have plenty of work. There is more and more “hempcrete”
becoming available with the ever increasing planting of industrial hemp (Cannabis
sativa), as farmer’s find it and increasingly profitable crop, and more reliable with our
often unreliable weather conditions.
But that is only part of the solution. What about containers? A lot of people might
think that there only use in importing/exporting our products. In fact, they make
excellent dwellings for a very cheap outlay. I’ve lived in one in the Northern Territory
for many months, running a particular camel operation. They can be fitted out to
meet any budget, from single containers of different sizes, to several joined together.
They are easily transported to any location. If Councils dismounted from their high
horses, and allowed them, this big housing problem could be drastically reduced.
There are caravan parks all around the country – why not “container” parks... well
designed and conveniently located next to essential services. All of the people that
make these decisions live in “comfortable” houses – how about sparing a thought for
the poor bastards that are trying to survive with increasing rents, or are living under a
cardboard box. That’s nothing for Australia to be proud of.
Tiny houses – are another very good alternative. Make it easier for people to utilize
these houses. A lot of Council’s frown on them or ban them outright.
It’s simply a fact of life that it is no longer every Australians right to own a house on a
quarter acre block like it used to be.
Container parks in particular could be imaginatively landscaped, and would look a lot
more attractive around country towns than the present rash of grey rooves being
built.
Many single and (often lonely) people often live in large houses. With a few
attractive incentives, some of these could be made available to be divided, to allow
for two families. Arguably, this could keep many elderly people from having to live in
aged care facilities, with the younger occupiers looking after the older ones. It might
be hard to make sure the original elderly owners were not being taken advantage of
but surely that could be monitored. I know this has all been brought up before.
There is an excellent Melbourne business “Frontier Life Construction Company”.
They create movable modular homes made from Australian materials with a high fire
rating. All people need is the land. Why don’t we hear these alternatives aired by the
media?
Comments